? Explanation of report features   View original ACBLscore output
Download hands in PBN or GIB or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Field strength:  Mean: 61 MP  Geomean: 35 MP
(based on 19 players, missing masterpoint data for 1 ACBL player)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Kenneth Fasbender - Phyllis Hogue 66.69 1st A 0.60
Ann Gill - Victoria Leland 61.96 2nd A 0.42
Karen Humphreys - Patricia Nieman 58.06 3rd A 0.30
Ann Staples - Joann Keiter 54.38 4th A 0.21
EVENT>Tuesday Afternoon Pairs  |SESSION>Tuesday Aft  |SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>May 16, 2017       |CLUB NO.>271825    | 05/16/2017 16:10
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Wanda Lonnon    |RATING>Club Masterpoint (60%, 50%, 30% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   42.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>100/20/5       |CLUB>Nil-2-Score
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=10/B=2/C=0                      ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Herb Parsons           Wanda Lonnon             A    NE    .     .     33.17  39.49          
 2 Kenneth Fasbender      Phyllis Hogue            A    1     .     .     56.02  66.69  0.60(A) 
 3 Victoria Leland        Ann Gill                 B    2     .     .     52.05  61.96  0.42(A) 
 4 Betty Riemen           Shari Theisen            A    .     .     .     40.80  48.57          
 5 Ann Staples            Joann Keiter             A    4     .     .     45.68  54.38  0.21(A) 
 6 Karen Humphreys        Patricia Nieman          A    3     .     .     48.77  58.06  0.30(A) 
 7 Carolyn Goering        Patricia Prendes         B    .     .     .     45.23  53.85          
 8 Patricia Dickerson     Kenneth Howell           A    .     .     .     42.37  50.44          
 9 Mary Klenda            Joan Navrat              A    .     .     .     30.04  35.76          
10 Carol Webb             Nancy Craig              A    .     .     .     26.01  30.96          
                                          Totals                         420.14       

Hands and Results
1 ♠KJT2
AJT4
AQ6
♣A5
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AQ987
7
98542
♣J6
♠63
K8652
KT
♣KT72
♠54
Q93
J73
♣Q9843
19
79
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2♣ 1/- 3/2 1/-♠ 3NT
       ♦7/6 ♠7/6
EW: -/1♠
       ♣4 ♦6 ♥4/5 ♠6/7 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 14 = +2
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          3.67   0.33  1N N +1   8  6-Humphreys-Nieman vs 5-Staples-Keiter
   70          2.00   2.00  1 N      ♠6  7-Goering-Prendes vs 3-Leland-Gill
         50    0.33   3.67  1 N -1   ♠6  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
2 ♠AQT2
A
AQT93
♣K42
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠874
Q92
54
♣QJT87
♠KJ93
KJT4
KJ8
♣A6
♠65
87653
762
♣953
19
516
0
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1  ♣5 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT4
EW: 2♣ 2 2♠ 2NT  ♦5
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   90          2.83   1.17  2 N      J  7-Goering-Prendes vs 3-Leland-Gill
   90          2.83   1.17  2 N      J  6-Humphreys-Nieman vs 5-Staples-Keiter
        110    0.33   3.67  2 E      7  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
3 ♠A74
Q62
Q972
♣A97
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KJ32
J7
84
♣KJT65
♠T8
T9843
KT5
♣842
♠Q965
AK5
AJ63
♣Q3
12
93
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 5 3 3/4♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3/2 NT3/2
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          3.67   0.33  3N S +1   ♣6  6-Humphreys-Nieman vs 5-Staples-Keiter
  400          2.00   2.00  3N S      ♣J  7-Goering-Prendes vs 3-Leland-Gill
        100    0.33   3.67  3N S -2   ♣6  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
4 ♠AK3
AK862
542
♣K2
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠Q9
Q4
T73
♣Q98765
♠T84
T75
A986
♣JT3
♠J7652
J93
KQJ
♣A4
17
65
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 6 6♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +1440 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1430          3.67   0.33  6 N      A  5-Staples-Keiter vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
  680          1.17   2.83  4 N +2   ♣J  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 3-Leland-Gill
  680          1.17   2.83  4 N +2   ♣J  8-Dickerson-Howell vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
5 ♠QJT
65
J65
♣A6532
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠9764
KJ7
T742
♣Q7
♠A5
AT843
AK9
♣J84
♠K832
Q92
Q83
♣KT9
8
616
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
EW: 2 3 1♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.67   0.33  4 E -1   ♠2  5-Staples-Keiter vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
        120    1.17   2.83  1N E +1   ♠8  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 3-Leland-Gill
        120    1.17   2.83  1N E +1   ♠2  8-Dickerson-Howell vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
6 ♠T84
864
62
♣JT975
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠A52
AQ
AJT8
♣AQ82
♠KQJ63
KJ3
Q5
♣K64
♠97
T9752
K9743
♣3
1
2115
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦1 ♥2 ♠0 NT0
EW: 5♣ 6 5 7♠ 7NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -2220 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        720    3.67   0.33  3N E +4   5  5-Staples-Keiter vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
       1430    2.00   2.00  6♠ E      4  8-Dickerson-Howell vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
       1460    0.33   3.67  6♠ E +1   9  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 3-Leland-Gill
7 ♠T9
9632
3
♣JT8654
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠K872
K4
AT6
♣AK72
♠J65
AQT75
QJ954
♣-
♠AQ43
J8
K872
♣Q93
1
1710
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠2 NT2
EW: 2/1♣ 5 6 5♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -1430 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        210    3.67   0.33  2N W +3   ♣J  10-Webb-Craig vs 1-Parsons-Lonnon
        650    2.00   2.00  4 E +1   2  6-Humphreys-Nieman vs 3-Leland-Gill
        690    0.33   3.67  3N W +3   3  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 5-Staples-Keiter
8 ♠K3
A976
KJ4
♣AJT3
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠J65
Q432
A
♣86542
♠AT82
K85
9865
♣Q7
♠Q974
JT
QT732
♣K9
16
79
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4 2 2♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥4/5 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.83   1.17  2N N +1   6  10-Webb-Craig vs 1-Parsons-Lonnon
  150          2.83   1.17  2N N +1   5  6-Humphreys-Nieman vs 3-Leland-Gill
  130          0.33   3.67  3 N +1   ♠A  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 5-Staples-Keiter
9 ♠K9732
98
A753
♣72
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠A
Q64
862
♣AQ6543
♠84
KJT752
KQ9
♣98
♠QJT65
A3
JT4
♣KJT
7
129
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣3 ♦6 ♥2 NT5
EW: 4♣ 5 1NT  ♦6 ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    2.00   2.00  4♠ S -1   ♣A  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 5-Staples-Keiter
         50    2.00   2.00  3♠ S -1   4  10-Webb-Craig vs 1-Parsons-Lonnon
         50    2.00   2.00  2♠ S -1   2  6-Humphreys-Nieman vs 3-Leland-Gill
10 ♠T9
753
Q976
♣K764
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠J7
AK9
AJT53
♣AJ5
♠A8653
QT862
84
♣9
♠KQ42
J4
K2
♣QT832
5
186
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT4
EW: 3 4 3♠ 2NT  ♣5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -620 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        150    3.88   0.13  2N W +1   ♣K  7-Goering-Prendes vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
        200    2.63   1.38  3 E +2   ♣3  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
        650    1.38   2.63  4 W +1   ♠T  10-Webb-Craig vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
        660    0.13   3.88  3N W +2   ♣4  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
11 ♠QJT93
K95
2
♣KQT9
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AK52
Q
7643
♣J642
♠64
AT8763
AKQ95
♣-
♠87
J42
JT8
♣A8753
11
1013
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦0 ♥2 ♠5 NT5
EW: 7 5 1♠ 2NT  ♣5
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: -1440 7-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        120    3.88   0.13  2N W      ♠Q  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
        170    2.00   2.00  2 E +2   ♠7  7-Goering-Prendes vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
        170    2.00   2.00  2 E +2   ♣5  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
        230    0.13   3.88  2 E +4   ♠8  10-Webb-Craig vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
12 ♠KJ632
942
A4
♣QT3
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠QT8
6
J753
♣KJ987
♠95
JT53
K962
♣542
♠A74
AKQ87
QT8
♣A6
10
74
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 6 6♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +1440 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          3.88   0.13  4 S +1   ♣8  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
  620          2.63   1.38  4 S      ♣9  7-Goering-Prendes vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
        100    0.75   3.25  6 S -1   ♣9  10-Webb-Craig vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
        100    0.75   3.25  5 N -1   2  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
13 ♠852
AQ9
43
♣T7532
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠-
KJ753
QJ8762
♣94
♠AKT3
842
AT5
♣KJ8
♠QJ9764
T6
K9
♣AQ6
6
715
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2/3♠  ♦4 ♥5 NT6
EW: 1 1  ♣4 ♠5/4 NT6/5
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: +140 3♠-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          4.00   0.00  5* W -2  ♠8  4-Riemen-Theisen vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
  100          2.00   2.00  3N E -1   ♠7  2-Fasbender-Hogue vs 7-Goering-Prendes
  100          2.00   2.00  4 W -1   ♠8  8-Dickerson-Howell vs 5-Staples-Keiter
  100          2.00   2.00  4 E -1   ♠Q  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 9-Klenda-Navrat
        100    0.00   4.00  4♠ S -1   ♣9  10-Webb-Craig vs 3-Leland-Gill
14 ♠85
T76
964
♣J8643
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AQT2
AJ8532
Q
♣AT
♠J9
9
AT87532
♣752
♠K7643
KQ4
KJ
♣KQ9
1
175
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦1 ♥3/4 ♠4 NT6
EW: 2♣ 5 3 2♠ 1NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -400 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   1.00  3N W -2   ♣3  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 9-Klenda-Navrat
  100          3.00   1.00  3 W -2   ♠8  2-Fasbender-Hogue vs 7-Goering-Prendes
  100          3.00   1.00  5 E -2   ♠4  8-Dickerson-Howell vs 5-Staples-Keiter
   50          1.00   3.00  3N W -1   ♣4  4-Riemen-Theisen vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
        200    0.00   4.00  2♠ S -4   Q  10-Webb-Craig vs 3-Leland-Gill
15 ♠Q8652
J5
AT
♣A954
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠974
QT962
872
♣JT
♠AK
K873
J965
♣Q86
♠JT3
A4
KQ43
♣K732
11
313
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 4♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          4.00   0.00  4♠ N      4  2-Fasbender-Hogue vs 7-Goering-Prendes
  170          3.00   1.00  2♠ N +2   2  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 9-Klenda-Navrat
  150          2.00   2.00  3 W -3   A  8-Dickerson-Howell vs 5-Staples-Keiter
   90          1.00   3.00  1N S      2  10-Webb-Craig vs 3-Leland-Gill
        100    0.00   4.00  4♠ N -1   J  4-Riemen-Theisen vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
16 ♠K76
QJ82
JT2
♣A53
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠AQT
T9543
K84
♣J4
♠85432
K6
Q765
♣87
♠J9
A7
A93
♣KQT962
11
105
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 2 2 1♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦5 ♥5/4 ♠6 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +430 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          4.00   0.00  3N N +1   7  2-Fasbender-Hogue vs 1-Parsons-Lonnon
  400          3.00   1.00  5♣ S      4  5-Staples-Keiter vs 7-Goering-Prendes
  150          2.00   2.00  2♣ N +3   4  10-Webb-Craig vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
  130          0.50   3.50  3♣ S +1   ♠A  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
  130          0.50   3.50  3♣ S +1   T  3-Leland-Gill vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
17 ♠K5
J95
QT93
♣K752
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠A43
AQ64
8
♣QJ843
♠Q862
T87
K542
♣A6
♠JT97
K32
AJ76
♣T9
9
139
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5 ♥4 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2♣ 3/2 2♠ 1NT  ♦6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -140 3-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          4.00   0.00  2N W -2   T  3-Leland-Gill vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
         80    3.00   1.00  1♠ E      ♣9  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
         90    1.50   2.50  2♣ W      ♠K  5-Staples-Keiter vs 7-Goering-Prendes
         90    1.50   2.50  2♣ W      9  2-Fasbender-Hogue vs 1-Parsons-Lonnon
        110    0.00   4.00  2♠ E      ♣T  10-Webb-Craig vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
18 ♠KJ85
K65
K97
♣A72
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠A7
32
J852
♣KQ963
♠T4
AQJT974
QT43
♣-
♠Q9632
8
A6
♣JT854
14
109
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3♠  ♦3 ♥4/3 NT6/5
EW: 4 2  ♣5 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          4.00   0.00  4♠ S      3  2-Fasbender-Hogue vs 1-Parsons-Lonnon
   50          3.00   1.00  2 E -1   ♣J  3-Leland-Gill vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
        100    2.00   2.00  4♠ S -1   3  5-Staples-Keiter vs 7-Goering-Prendes
        140    0.50   3.50  3 E      A  9-Klenda-Navrat vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
        140    0.50   3.50  3 E      ♣J  10-Webb-Craig vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
19 ♠Q63
Q43
54
♣AT963
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KJ2
T5
AKQJ732
♣7
♠85
KJ98
98
♣J8542
♠AT974
A762
T6
♣KQ
8
145
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT4
EW: 3 2NT  ♣6 ♥6 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -100 3♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    4.00   0.00  3♠ S -2   A  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 7-Goering-Prendes
        130    2.00   2.00  3 W +1   ♠Q  3-Leland-Gill vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
        130    2.00   2.00  3 W +1   ♠Q  6-Humphreys-Nieman vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
        130    2.00   2.00  3 W +1   ♠Q  10-Webb-Craig vs 5-Staples-Keiter
        150    0.00   4.00  3 W +2   ♠Q  4-Riemen-Theisen vs 9-Klenda-Navrat
20 ♠86
Q6
AK82
♣KQJ85
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A742
J753
-
♣A9632
♠KQT9
AT8
Q9654
♣7
♠J53
K942
JT73
♣T4
15
911
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5/6 ♥4/5 ♠3 NT6/5
EW: 1♣ 2 4♠  ♦6 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          4.00   0.00  4♠ E -1   ♣T  10-Webb-Craig vs 5-Staples-Keiter
        110    3.00   1.00  2♠ E      J  6-Humphreys-Nieman vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
        140    1.00   3.00  3♠ E      ♣T  3-Leland-Gill vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
        140    1.00   3.00  2♠ W +1   ♣K  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 7-Goering-Prendes
        140    1.00   3.00  2♠ W +1   ♣K  4-Riemen-Theisen vs 9-Klenda-Navrat
21 ♠-
K93
QJ653
♣KT972
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QJ843
AQJT6
4
♣J5
♠AT6
754
AK87
♣A84
♠K9752
82
T92
♣Q63
9
1115
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2/1  ♥2 ♠3 NT4
EW: 4/5 4♠ 2NT  ♣5/6 ♦5
LoTT: 19 - 16 = +3
Par: -450 5-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          4.00   0.00  4 E -1   ♠5  4-Riemen-Theisen vs 9-Klenda-Navrat
        170    3.00   1.00  2 W +2   Q  3-Leland-Gill vs 2-Fasbender-Hogue
        180    2.00   2.00  2N E +2   ♠9  1-Parsons-Lonnon vs 7-Goering-Prendes
        420    1.00   3.00  4♠ W      Q  6-Humphreys-Nieman vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
        430    0.00   4.00  3N E +1   ♠9  10-Webb-Craig vs 5-Staples-Keiter
22 ♠A4
A987
AT973
♣Q7
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠6532
J64
52
♣J532
♠K97
T2
KQ86
♣AT98
♠QJT8
KQ53
J4
♣K64
14
212
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♣ 4/3 4 3♠ 4/3NT
       ♣7/6
EW:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +430 4NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.88   0.13  1 E -2   K  7-Goering-Prendes vs 9-Klenda-Navrat
  170          2.63   1.38  1 S +3   ♣A  2-Fasbender-Hogue vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
  140          1.38   2.63  2 S +1   2  10-Webb-Craig vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
  110          0.13   3.88  1♠ S +1   5  4-Riemen-Theisen vs 3-Leland-Gill
23 ♠J6
AJ762
K832
♣Q7
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠QT3
Q85
A6
♣KT543
♠K975
T3
QT754
♣A2
♠A842
K94
J9
♣J986
11
119
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1NT  ♣6 ♦5 ♠4
EW: 1♣ 2 2♠  ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.88   0.13  2N W -1   7  2-Fasbender-Hogue vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
    PASS       2.63   1.38  Pass Out      10-Webb-Craig vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
        100    0.75   3.25  2 N -1   ♣A  4-Riemen-Theisen vs 3-Leland-Gill
        100    0.75   3.25  2 N -1   ♣A  7-Goering-Prendes vs 9-Klenda-Navrat
24 ♠J8542
J632
KT
♣A2
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KQ3
T975
QJ63
♣JT
♠T9
Q8
A82
♣KQ8543
♠A76
AK4
9754
♣976
9
911
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣4 ♦6 NT6
EW: 2♣ -/1 1NT  ♦6/7 ♥6 ♠5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +100 2NT*-EW/3♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.25   0.75  3♣ E -1   ♠6  2-Fasbender-Hogue vs 8-Dickerson-Howell
   50          3.25   0.75  3♣ E -1   4  4-Riemen-Theisen vs 3-Leland-Gill
        110    0.75   3.25  2♣ E +1   A  7-Goering-Prendes vs 9-Klenda-Navrat
        110    0.75   3.25  2♣ E +1   A  10-Webb-Craig vs 6-Humphreys-Nieman
25 ♠987
QT53
K7
♣9542
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠AQT63
AJ2
Q84
♣QT
♠K5
K9876
9632
♣J7
♠J42
4
AJT5
♣AK863
5
157
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1 1♠  ♣3 ♦5 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: +90 2♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.67   0.33  2 E -1   ♣6  8-Dickerson-Howell vs 1-Parsons-Lonnon
         80    2.00   2.00  1♠ W      ♣9  5-Staples-Keiter vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
        100    0.33   3.67  2 S -2   ♣T  10-Webb-Craig vs 7-Goering-Prendes
26 ♠K94
AT975
J98
♣A7
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AT6
6
Q653
♣QT854
♠Q32
K82
AT
♣J9632
♠J875
QJ43
K742
♣K
12
810
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2 1♠ 1NT  ♣5
EW: 2♣  ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 19 = -3
Par: +110 2-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.67   0.33  3 N      ♣9  8-Dickerson-Howell vs 1-Parsons-Lonnon
  110          2.00   2.00  2 N      ♣3  5-Staples-Keiter vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
        200    0.33   3.67  3 N -2   A  10-Webb-Craig vs 7-Goering-Prendes
27 ♠K
A642
T63
♣KJT42
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠J82
QT853
J84
♣93
♠AQ764
KJ9
Q
♣AQ76
♠T953
7
AK9752
♣85
11
418
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♣ 3/2
       ♣7/6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
EW: 3 3♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -100 4*-S-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.67   0.33  3N E -3   9  8-Dickerson-Howell vs 1-Parsons-Lonnon
         50    2.00   2.00  3 S -1   ♠J  5-Staples-Keiter vs 4-Riemen-Theisen
        420    0.33   3.67  4♠ E      A  10-Webb-Craig vs 7-Goering-Prendes